Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €385.59 vs €1021.74
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 9 5950X - €2.31 vs €5.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900F - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
167
94%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€385.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €385.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.77/FPS
40%
Price, €
€1021.74
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,021.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |