Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900F - 672 vs 592 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €148.10 vs €385.59
- Up to 66% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900F - €0.22 vs €0.65 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €385.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 495 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |