Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - €385.59 vs €699.90
- Up to 45% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 3950X - €0.71 vs €1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900F - 543 vs 542 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€385.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €385.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9018 minutes ago
Buy for €699.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9018 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |