In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900F is slightly slower than the Core i7-11700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-11700K
- Up to 16% faster in Battlefield 6 – 102 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Core i7-11700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
102 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
76 FPS
100%
Price, $
$324.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i7-11700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i7-11700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Core i7-11700K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
