Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 562 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700T.
Advantages of Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-9700T - 452 vs 413 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-9700T - €339.00 vs €425.43
- Up to 27% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-9700T - €0.75 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €425.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
452
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700T | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |