Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700T.
Advantages of Core i7-9700T
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €425.43 vs €472.75
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700T - 166 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700T - €2.85 vs €3.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €425.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 303 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€472.75
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €472.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 302 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700T | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |