Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1352 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700T.
Advantages of Core i7-9700T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 36% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700T - 488 vs 360 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-9700T - €148.10 vs €425.43
- Up to 75% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700T - €0.30 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €425.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |