Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 5161 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Core i7-965
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €998.00 vs €1169.00
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-965 - 556 vs 451 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i7-965 - €2.10 vs €2.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €998 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 298 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
556
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
85%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 298 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-965 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |