Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5161 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-965.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-965 - 197 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-965 - €148.10 vs €998.00
- Up to 89% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-965 - €0.75 vs €6.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €998 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-965 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |