Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3574 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 28% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-920XM - 212 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920XM | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |