Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4851 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-920XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-920XM - 527 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
527
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920XM | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |