Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €134.84 vs €1169.00
- Up to 86% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.39 vs €2.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-6700 - 423 vs 345 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
345
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €134.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6846 minutes ago
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6846 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |