Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Core i7-3840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3676 days newer than Core i7-3840QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3840QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 111% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3840QM - 542 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3840QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€266.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €266.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 775 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3840QM | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |