Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 131 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €64.03 vs €1014.81
- Up to 92% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.39 vs €4.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 34% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-10105F - 220 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6824 minutes ago
Buy for €1,014.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6824 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |