Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - €64.03 vs €639.00
- Up to 89% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 8700G - €0.52 vs €4.70 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - 136 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Buy for €639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |