The Core i3-10100 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10320, however, it's a better value for money, as it's €47.67 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10100
- Up to 31% cheaper – €108.40 vs €156.07
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-10320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
186
98%
Min 1% FPS
124
99%
Price, €
€108.4
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€156.07
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
71%
Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-10320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-10320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10100 vs Core i3-10320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |