Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Core i3-10320 - 73 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €148.10 vs €178.53
- Up to 32% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-10320 - €2.03 vs €2.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €178.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |