The Celeron G5900 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G5900
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-11600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 2 threads
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-11600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171
84%
Min 1% FPS
115
86%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€377.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
100%
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-11600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G5900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
58 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |