Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 5700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 384 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700X.
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 7 5700X - 193 vs 191 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €154.34 vs €261.97
- Up to 40% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-11600K - €0.81 vs €1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 16 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
60%
Price, €
€261.97
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
191
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600K | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |