The Celeron G3900 is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-8120. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3900 vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€21.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G3900 vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
