Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1610T - 343 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 32 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
343
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |