Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3970 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G1610T - 196 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 32 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€494.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |