Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 840 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 3965U - 239 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 16 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
