Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1917 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron 3965U - 109 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 16 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €167.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |