Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 50% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron 3965U - 159 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
