Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2076 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 3205U - 194 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1020.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,020.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |