Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2440 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 3205U - 132 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€493.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €493.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |