Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3361 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 35% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron 1000M - 577 vs 426 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
577
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €63.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |