Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3636 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron 1000M - 150 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 388 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |