Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Athlon 3000G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €53.07 vs €136.97
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10600K - €0.25 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Athlon 3000G - 219 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
213
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
40%
Price, €
€136.97
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8847 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G | vs | Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |