Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €82.15 vs €136.97
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600K - €0.43 vs €0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
61%
Price, €
€136.97
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7490 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7490 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600K | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |