Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 1155 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - 284 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 48 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
284
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Chagall | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |