Buy on Amazon
€17.45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2749
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 634 days newer than Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-9900K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.45
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i9-9900K 8x3,6 (Boost 5,0) GHz R0 16MB-L3 Cache UHD 630 Sockel 1151
Buy for €17.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i9-9900K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
99.22062350119904%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
