Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 3198 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield IV than FX-4100 - 427 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
368
86.18266978922716%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |