Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is 2821 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
- Performs up to 38% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - 193 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Server/Workstation • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1659
100%
Multi-Core
10709
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
