Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €205.04 vs €399.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.38 vs €2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €205.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |