Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€251.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €251.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 947 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 80 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |