Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3434 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 40% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 127 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
487
19.7165991902834%
Multi-Core
2427
20.875623602270775%
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
