Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3594 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Core i7-2820QM - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€304.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €304.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Core i7-2820QM |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Vermeer | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1224 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |