Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2555 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 17% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-2820QM - 144 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€235.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €235.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |