Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 402 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 56 vs 16 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 28 |
| 16 | Threads | 56 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 255 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
