Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon W-2125 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 921 days newer than Xeon W-2125.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon W-2125 - 123 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Xeon W-2125 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
