Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 54 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 168 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 20 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€307.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €307.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |