Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 668 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 291 vs 268 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
291
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€271
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €271 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |