Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1056 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than Core i7-7700T - 198 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - €177.21 vs €579.7
- Up to 64% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 3950X - €1.05 vs €2.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9261 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €177.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9261 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |