Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1112 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 244 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
