Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2290 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 136 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€509.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €509.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
37.03199455411845%
Multi-Core
3898
20.204219146840824%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |