Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 555 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 16% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 7 3700U - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 64 vs 8 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2846.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |