Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 323 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3700U - 426 vs 390 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 64 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
426
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2439.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,439.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |