Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2419 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G530 - 232 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - €20.16 vs €290.43
- Up to 93% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 7 2700X - €0.09 vs €1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
221
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |